Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Ocelot II

(126,787 posts)

5. Exactly, and that's basically what the judge said.

Reply to Chasstev365 (Reply #3)

Mon Aug 11, 2025, 02:33 PM

Aug 11

He wasn't willing to violate the general rule of maintaining the secrecy of grand jury proceedings in service of the DoJ's pretense of transparency, since there was really nothing new to be revealed.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Transcripts of grand jury that indicted Epstein ex-girlfriend Maxwell won't be unsealed, judge says [View all] ShazzieB Aug 11 OP

Massive smack in the face JustAnotherGen Aug 11 #1

Not at all. The judge pointed out that while there was nothing in the grand jury materials Ocelot II Aug 11 #4

Deadline: Legal Blog-Judge denies Trump DOJ motion to unseal Maxwell grand jury transcripts and exhibits LetMyPeopleVote Aug 11 #2

Isn't this a good thing? Chasstev365 Aug 11 #3

Exactly, and that's basically what the judge said. Ocelot II Aug 11 #5

AFTER a review by forum hosts LOCKING Omaha Steve Aug 11 #6