Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(158,685 posts)
3. That position is under the Legislative Branch (Congress), not the Executive Branch
Tue Aug 12, 2025, 07:51 AM
Aug 12

I don't know if there are enough GOPers willing to do that (at least without some major blowback from the fiscal hawks, but not for the reasons of making "the rich richer and the poor poorer" ).

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3458070

In the case of the CBO, the Speaker of the House and Senate Pro Tempore appoint someone as "Director".


(created by the "Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974" )

From here - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3471693

https://www.cbo.gov/about/history

History

Beginning in the early 1920s, the President began to assume more prominence in setting the federal budget. The Budget and Accounting Act of 1921 gave the President overall responsibility for budget planning by requiring him to submit an annual, comprehensive budget proposal to the Congress; that act also expanded the President’s control over budgetary information by establishing the Bureau of the Budget (renamed the Office of Management and Budget in 1971). By contrast, the Congress lacked institutional capacity to establish and enforce budgetary priorities, coordinate actions on spending and revenue legislation, or develop budgetary and economic information independently of the executive branch.

Conflict between the legislative and executive branches reached a high point during the summer of 1974, when Members of Congress objected to President Richard Nixon’s threats to withhold Congressional appropriations for programs that were inconsistent with his policies (a process known as impoundment). The dispute led to the enactment of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 in July of that year.

That act reasserted the Congress’s constitutional control over the budget by establishing new procedures for controlling impoundments and by instituting a formal process through which the Congress could develop, coordinate, and enforce its own budgetary priorities independently of the President.
In addition, the law created new legislative institutions to implement the new Congressional budget process: the House and Senate Budget Committees to oversee execution of the budget process and the Congressional Budget Office to provide the Budget Committees and the Congress with objective, impartial information about budgetary and economic issues. The agency began operating on February 24, 1975, when Alice Rivlin was appointed its first Director.

(snip)


H.R.7130 - Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's obvious that TSF and Congress (R's only) are trying to get away no_hypocrisy Aug 12 #1
in other news, the head of the budget office soon to be fired. nt Javaman Aug 12 #2
That position is under the Legislative Branch (Congress), not the Executive Branch BumRushDaShow Aug 12 #3
Doesn't mean he won't try. And also make the persons life miserable Javaman Aug 12 #24
He dubs himself "the king of debt" BumRushDaShow Aug 13 #25
Thank you captain obvious Ray Bruns Aug 12 #4
The Democrats in Congress asked them to research and publish that report. BumRushDaShow Aug 12 #5
That top 10% wont spend that mony as quick and mostly shuffle it IbogaProject Aug 12 #6
I Thought That Was The Whole Idea DallasNE Aug 12 #7
critical to be aware of also, this is a nonpartisan office cadoman Aug 12 #8
As expected. Nothing new here. republianmushroom Aug 12 #9
So it's going as planned FoxNewsSucks Aug 12 #10
$13K is pocket change for these people Bayard Aug 12 #11
Fuck the rich! They don't need any more money! Initech Aug 12 #12
Dems run on that! usregimechange Aug 12 #13
They HAVE run on that BumRushDaShow Aug 12 #14
DNC needs to bite this bone and hang on through storm and drag BoRaGard Aug 12 #15
The person that produced this report, will lose their job after Mierda47 reads it. n/t aggiesal Aug 12 #16
No shit. We've known that for decades. sakabatou Aug 12 #17
But isn't that always the bedrock-foundational objective of the GOP? calimary Aug 12 #18
Fucking shocking Pacifist Patriot Aug 12 #19
Yeah, thanks Sherlock underpants Aug 13 #27
Poverty 101 mntleo2 Aug 12 #20
Excellent post. Thank you and thank you for what you do. underpants Aug 13 #28
Of course, it is. Trump as a thief and a liar and MAGAT are idiots. rickyhall Aug 12 #21
Don't worry Trump will fire them Quanto Magnus Aug 12 #22
Isn't that its whole purpose? LeftishBrit Aug 12 #23
And too many poor people in red states will vote for the fucking GOP due to culture wars. OrlandoDem2 Aug 13 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Budget office says GOP's ...»Reply #3