Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bucolic_frolic

(52,004 posts)
52. Thinking like this could up-end many things
Tue Aug 12, 2025, 11:55 AM
Aug 12

Academia, traffic control systems, computer science to name a few.

Let's turn over the world to magical thinking.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh? Tell me who is SUPERIOR to "experts" then . . . . . no_hypocrisy Aug 12 #1
R effin' K jr does his own research. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 12 #4
... on RW internet. marble falls Aug 12 #10
Trust is not a feature of science hueymahl Aug 12 #13
Really? Who exactly do you trust for information?nt Phoenix61 Aug 12 #17
That poster is correct. yardwork Aug 12 #39
Excellent point! biophile Aug 12 #31
"Many of the experts?" vanlassie Aug 12 #37
Former NEJM editor, others feel the same biophile Aug 12 #50
You have not substantiated your statement. vanlassie Aug 12 #56
My opinion/belief has nothing to do with science dpibel Aug 12 #35
I think you're both right but saying things differently. yardwork Aug 12 #40
That is not what it is about Nasruddin Aug 12 #64
De worm. IrishAfricanAmerican Aug 12 #20
We need to define "expert." sop Aug 12 #36
also need to account for "experts" that go off the deep end cadoman Aug 12 #41
Peer review is necessary, in all fields, particularly journalism. "Expertise" should stand up to scrutiny. sop Aug 12 #53
But ignoring the experts *is* a feature of authoritarianism.... unblock Aug 12 #2
Why yes it is. mgardener Aug 12 #6
I think you have it backwards pcdb Aug 12 #61
Yes, but authoritarians are even more blatantly, and literally, all about the appeal to authority fallacy unblock Aug 12 #62
Trusting only the "experts" who agree with your crackpot beliefs is not science. tanyev Aug 12 #3
Very true Rebl2 Aug 12 #42
This guy is a fuck9ng disaster. johnnyfins Aug 12 #5
Think about all the charitable entities Mr. Evil Aug 12 #29
This man is a gd dangerous idiot. Experts are science based. Irish_Dem Aug 12 #7
Well... OldBaldy1701E Aug 12 #15
I am assuming we are talking about real experts not frauds. Irish_Dem Aug 12 #66
Exactly. OldBaldy1701E Aug 12 #67
How much of his brain did that worm eat? oasis Aug 12 #8
Or it's all worm shit...n/t the nelm Aug 12 #34
Part of it Rebl2 Aug 12 #43
The only thing in there to being with WAS the worm. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Aug 12 #60
But pulling it from his butt and reading woooo on the internet is science. He had to have been switched at birth ... marble falls Aug 12 #9
Bobby Jr: "You can't control the amount of energy that everybody is getting." area51 Aug 12 #11
I saw that too... Moostache Aug 12 #45
I read that and nearly did a spit take. maxsolomon Aug 12 #59
What is this sick, deranged fuck doing, in charge of the nation's health? Paladin Aug 12 #12
Trump knew he was an idiot. Birds of a feather..... twodogsbarking Aug 12 #14
Kennedy appears to be very "new agey" in his thinking.. LiberalArkie Aug 12 #16
I don't Rebl2 Aug 12 #44
This guy's better than Buckaroo Bonzai. nt BootinUp Aug 12 #18
HEY! Don't insult Buckaroo Banzai that way. HE was a real neurosurgeon, physicist ms liberty Aug 12 #25
No matter where you go, there you are..... Bayard Aug 12 #46
"Trusting the experts is not a feature of either a science or democracy," Kennedy said." MLWR Aug 12 #19
Unfuckingbelievable. NNadir Aug 12 #21
"control the amount of energy"??? WTAF??? LymphocyteLover Aug 12 #22
'Murica truly is the land of opportunity, even an anti-vax conspiracy theorist long term heroin user ..... groundloop Aug 12 #23
You need to put that on a T-shirt and sell it. Dem2theMax Aug 12 #58
Yet he expects us to trust the expert heroin junky. truthisfreedom Aug 12 #24
Don't trust science, but trust an idiot. Nothing new here. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Firestorm49 Aug 12 #26
Trusting a brain damaged ex junkie isn't either Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 12 #27
And listening to you, Boobie, is far worse. Get a real job, like Chief Bottle Washer at an aluminum plant. Wonder Why Aug 12 #28
Fuck that freakshow fool Blue Owl Aug 12 #30
He's gonna kill so fucking many of us. Eliot Rosewater Aug 12 #32
But scrutinizing the evidence is C_U_L8R Aug 12 #33
But trusting an idiot who believes in quack medicine is? Dave Bowman Aug 12 #38
For anyone who missed it the first time around, Bayard Aug 12 #47
Trusting the experts is not a feature of either a science or democracy? patphil Aug 12 #48
I 100% agree. (nt) oasis Aug 12 #70
Trusting one who think he knows more than the experts is very foolish. republianmushroom Aug 12 #49
Trusting an idiot is not science. milestogo Aug 12 #51
Thinking like this could up-end many things bucolic_frolic Aug 12 #52
For some reason, magical thinking is Haggard Celine Aug 12 #57
"5,000 peer-reviewed studies" Who reviewed them? Just whoever? underpants Aug 12 #54
Vax research gfarber Aug 12 #55
So instead of experts Nasruddin Aug 12 #63
Trusting Brain Worm Bobby BlueMTexpat Aug 12 #65
My high school biology asks: What the F--k is he talking about? How much energy is in a dead virus? What? rickyhall Aug 12 #68
... He said, in his capacity as a self-proclaimed EXPERT?????? BurnDoubt Aug 12 #69
Research funding wasn't canceled? Nt BadgerKid Aug 13 #71
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»RFK Jr. in interview with...»Reply #52