Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

James48

(4,965 posts)
12. The equal time rule is not the same as the Fairness doctrine.
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 06:18 AM
Sep 19

Equal time rule just says CANDIDATES have to be given equal opportunity on the air.

The View doesn’t normally interview CANDIDATES and is therefore not covered by the equal time rule.

Known officially as the equal opportunities rule. It is still in effect and applies to both radio and television broadcasters. The rule is enforced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and is not to be confused with the now-defunct Fairness Doctrine.

How the equal opportunities rule works

The equal opportunities rule is part of Section 315 of the Communications Act of 1934 and requires that:

If a broadcast station gives or sells air time to a legally qualified political candidate, it must offer "equal opportunities" to all other legally qualified candidates for the same office.

"Equal opportunities" typically means providing a comparable amount of time and audience size. The opposing candidate must request the time within seven days of the original broadcast.

Broadcasters are forbidden from censoring the content of the candidates' messages during a "use" of their facility.

The rule also requires stations to charge qualified candidates the "lowest unit charge" for advertising during the 45 days before a primary and 60 days before a general election.

Key exemptions from the rule

The equal opportunities rule does not apply to candidate appearances in certain "bona fide" news programming. These exemptions include bona fide newscasts, news interviews, on-the-spot coverage of bona fide news events, and news documentaries where the candidate's appearance is incidental.

The equal opportunities rule vs. the Fairness Doctrine

The equal opportunities rule differs from the repealed Fairness Doctrine. While the equal opportunities rule applies to political candidates and requires equal airtime opportunities, the Fairness Doctrine applied to controversial issues and required broadcasters to cover important issues on an equal basis.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good. Fiendish Thingy Sep 18 #1
Watching the View daily LittleGirl Sep 19 #10
That's not true. Fiendish Thingy Sep 19 #13
Sorry. I disagree. LittleGirl Sep 19 #16
Doesn't matter if you disagree, the facts are evident Fiendish Thingy Sep 19 #17
"Cowardly"? WTF. That panel has been strongly anti-Trump, urging people to vote, might be the only political betsuni Sep 19 #11
They are supposed to be outspoken, opinionated women Fiendish Thingy Sep 19 #14
WRONG. They were waiting for Kimmel to make a statement as they did for Colbert and Friday's show pre-taped. betsuni Sep 22 #20
They were silent for two days Fiendish Thingy Sep 22 #21
So ABC paid that million dollar bribe to satisfy Trump. OK that settles that - we good now Donald? NOPE. Marie Marie Sep 18 #2
The Fairness Doctrine is No More MrWowWow Sep 18 #3
I was just about to say that! What the fuck is he talking about!? nt SunSeeker Sep 18 #4
My first thought too n/t hibbing Sep 18 #6
The equal time rule is not the same as the Fairness doctrine. James48 Sep 19 #12
+1 onenote Sep 19 #18
I suspect Rachel and Lawrence are on Trump's hit list Zorro Sep 18 #5
Think a little farther down the road... LPBBEAR Sep 19 #9
It's beginning to look like they're going after the progressive media one-by-one ificandream Sep 18 #7
What's to go after? Aren't they already "Fair & Balanced?" I think I read that somewhere, and they even admitted it.... 24601 Sep 18 #8
The only real way to go after those outlets... SickOfTheOnePct Sep 19 #15
Carr again shows his lack of familiarity with Communications Law onenote Sep 19 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FCC chair puts 'The View'...»Reply #12