Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(45,694 posts)
19. Carr again shows his lack of familiarity with Communications Law
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 01:16 PM
Sep 19

The equal opportunities rule applies to appearances by qualified candidates for office during a period preceding an election. The View does not make a habit of having candidates as guests, although in the fall of 2024 both Harris and Walz appeared. The thing is that if trump and vance thought they were entitled to equal "time" they could have made a request and the issue of whether the show is an exempt bona fide news program would have been presented to the FCC -- which almost certainly would have, based on precedent, concluded it was exempt.

The FCC doesn't issue sue sponge opinions on whether a program is or isn't a bona fide news show. Someone would have to ask the FCC for a rolling. What Carr is trying to is deter the View from hosting candidates going forward by, essentially, encouraging a competing candidate to file a complaint. Of course, what the View could do is pre-empt the issue by offering time for an appearance by the other candidate.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good. Fiendish Thingy Sep 18 #1
Watching the View daily LittleGirl Sep 19 #10
That's not true. Fiendish Thingy Sep 19 #13
Sorry. I disagree. LittleGirl Sep 19 #16
Doesn't matter if you disagree, the facts are evident Fiendish Thingy Sep 19 #17
"Cowardly"? WTF. That panel has been strongly anti-Trump, urging people to vote, might be the only political betsuni Sep 19 #11
They are supposed to be outspoken, opinionated women Fiendish Thingy Sep 19 #14
WRONG. They were waiting for Kimmel to make a statement as they did for Colbert and Friday's show pre-taped. betsuni Sep 22 #20
They were silent for two days Fiendish Thingy Sep 22 #21
So ABC paid that million dollar bribe to satisfy Trump. OK that settles that - we good now Donald? NOPE. Marie Marie Sep 18 #2
The Fairness Doctrine is No More MrWowWow Sep 18 #3
I was just about to say that! What the fuck is he talking about!? nt SunSeeker Sep 18 #4
My first thought too n/t hibbing Sep 18 #6
The equal time rule is not the same as the Fairness doctrine. James48 Sep 19 #12
+1 onenote Sep 19 #18
I suspect Rachel and Lawrence are on Trump's hit list Zorro Sep 18 #5
Think a little farther down the road... LPBBEAR Sep 19 #9
It's beginning to look like they're going after the progressive media one-by-one ificandream Sep 18 #7
What's to go after? Aren't they already "Fair & Balanced?" I think I read that somewhere, and they even admitted it.... 24601 Sep 18 #8
The only real way to go after those outlets... SickOfTheOnePct Sep 19 #15
Carr again shows his lack of familiarity with Communications Law onenote Sep 19 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FCC chair puts 'The View'...»Reply #19