Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LatteLady

(85 posts)
12. We are less expensive dead.
Wed Sep 24, 2025, 11:08 AM
Sep 24

The government could use AI to improve patient outcomes. But no. It’s all about the $$$ while billionaires get tax cuts.

I’m especially concerned because many chronic conditions seen in older adults cannot be “cured” and have to be managed long term. Will they define tests and treatments that do not “cure” to be wasteful?

Also worried that the high variability in response to treatments seen in groups of older adults means that the “average” response to a treatment may be used for AI decision making despite being accompanied by subgroups of patients that respond very well. Will all older adults, including those individuals who might really benefit, be denied a certain treatment because the average response is not stellar?

Also worried that they’re very aware Medicare would save a lot of money if older people would just die versus needing health care.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Private health insurers u...»Reply #12