Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bob_in_VA

(110 posts)
12. IANAL
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 10:06 AM
Saturday

But my understanding is that an attorney is an officer of the court and as such, lying to the judge has consequences. Fairly substantial consequences. See below

Lawyers who violate their ethical duties as officers of the court may face significant professional and legal consequences.

Disciplinary action: State bar associations investigate complaints of misconduct and can issue sanctions such as:
Private or public reprimands: A formal warning for misconduct.
Suspension: The attorney is prohibited from practicing law for a specified period.
Disbarment: The attorney's license to practice is revoked permanently.
Contempt of court: A judge can impose fines or even jail time for direct acts of disrespect or disobedience, such as making a false statement.
Legal liability: An attorney's misconduct may expose them to civil lawsuits for malpractice from clients who were harmed by their actions.

Lying to judge is considered a violation of their ethical duties.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pity the grand jury didn't laugh Halligan out of the room. tanyev Saturday #1
Stupid is as stupid does... SickOfTheOnePct Saturday #2
Maybe because she has never prosecuted a case would probably be a place to look first. Bengus81 Saturday #3
Insurance lawyer is a step up from parking garage lawyer. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Saturday #6
Which means that no competent prosecutor wanted to go within 100 miles of this case. Bluetus Saturday #13
There's nothing like on the job training. Buddyzbuddy Saturday #4
14 of 23 is slim majority and does not portend a 12-0 guilty verdict. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Saturday #5
felon must be running out of crooked lawyers Marthe48 Saturday #7
Seems like the judge is looking at both incompetent prosecution, malicious prosecution, & a doj prosecutor who plays ancianita Saturday #8
You can indict a ham sandwich with 14 of 23 votes. James48 Saturday #9
Forgive my ignorance in legal matters, but there seems to be some dishonesty 70sEraVet Saturday #10
IANAL Bob_in_VA Saturday #12
Thanks for that, Bob 70sEraVet Saturday #17
Now there's a thought.... Bayard Saturday #19
Smells like fraud IbogaProject Saturday #11
Yeah pretty sure Haaligan is gonna go to jail... SSJVegeta Saturday #14
Is anyone else old enough to remember . . . AverageOldGuy Saturday #15
This is the thing.... Dem4life1970 Saturday #16
I smell a rat and if I were this judge I would be moniss Saturday #18
Donny hires rank amateurs because he's afraid of those smarter than him. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Saturday #20
Makes you hildegaard28 Monday #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge who reviewed James ...»Reply #12