Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

no_hypocrisy

(53,218 posts)
5. When there is a civil lawsuit and a party wants to avoid the time and expense of a trial,
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 05:07 PM
Saturday

he/she/they/it makes a motion for summary judgment. If granted that means that the judge agrees that there is no controversy about the facts. If both parties agree on the facts, there's no need for a jury to decide who or what to believe. The judge then decides on the law.

You make a motion, hand in a legal brief with or without documents to support your argument.

By Trump telling his DHS official to fire an official for following the current law, both parties agree that happened and that the law was in force at the time of the firing.

The only thing left is for the judge to decide whether it's within the law to fire someone for following the rules.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump fires US attorney w...»Reply #5