Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Private payrolls declined in September by 32,000 in key ADP report coming amid shutdown data blackout [View all]BaronChocula
(3,455 posts)12. Guess who'll be raging at ADP soon
in all caps.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Private payrolls declined in September by 32,000 in key ADP report coming amid shutdown data blackout [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Wednesday
OP
A key MAGA report will have some cooked up numbers saying everything is awesome
IronLionZion
Wednesday
#1
Well, here's a former head of the BLS indicating Trump could impact upcoming reports, regardless of who's commissioner:
SunSeeker
Wednesday
#13
Nice try. But you failed big time. You'll find that I've never typed a single word in any post here
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#15
"Ridiculous" is thinking we still live in a world where we don't have Trump slandering BLS staffers.
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#29
maga might easily ignore numbers, but corporations will not, and maga will notice layoffs around them
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#33
You failed at your implication of tRump interference. "unless" is a hypothetical, a possibility, nowhere near a fact.nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#22
Trump has interfered by slandering BLS statisticians. That is why Groshen is worried (her words).
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#28
We are all worried, but it is important to not cynically assume facts not in evidence. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#31
There's plenty of evidence of Trump defaming BLS staff and BLS survey responses dropping off.
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#36
Declines in survey responses have been happening slowly without tRump. There is no evidence he has accelerated it.
Bernardo de La Paz
23 hrs ago
#38
Groshen is not insulting BLS, nor am I. We are pointing out how Trump is harming BLS.
SunSeeker
22 hrs ago
#39
Your excerpt indicates NO problem from political influence and MAYBE survey lack of response maybe in the FUTURE. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#20
Groshen is worried for a reason. I think she knows what she is talking about.
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#30
Exactly as I stated. She is worried about survey participation, NOT about fudging data or calculations.
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#32
You fail to understand Groshen's (and my) point. Participation drops hurt data accuracy.
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#35
Data inaccuracy due to survey response rates is NOT corruption, NOR is it interference, NOR is it the fault of BLS.
Bernardo de La Paz
23 hrs ago
#37
ADP reported a loss in the monthly jobs report only once in Joe Biden's 4 years (March 23).
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#11
Delaying the release of the Jobs Report during a shutdown is standard operating procedure
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#16
No report coming out of the government with trump's hand picked cronies can be trusted.
lostincalifornia
Wednesday
#18
There are ZERO hand-picked cronies at BLS. The single one and only political nominee has been withdrawn.
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#23
Excuse me Bernardo. He just fired the BLS Commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, because he didn't like
lostincalifornia
Wednesday
#24
It is a mistake to think that because one person was fired, suddenly all the unfired employees are corrupt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#25
What, the Department of Justice is targeting the Presidents political enemies?
Buddyzbuddy
Wednesday
#19