Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(164,066 posts)
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 09:45 AM Nov 10

Supreme Court rejects call to overturn its decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide [View all]

Source: AP

Updated 9:55 AM EST, November 10, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a call to overturn its landmark decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. The justices, without comment, turned away an appeal from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the high court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Davis had been trying to get the court to overturn a lower-court order for her to pay $360,000 in damages and attorney’s fees to a couple denied a marriage license. Her lawyers repeatedly invoked the words of Justice Clarence Thomas, who alone among the nine justices has called for erasing the same-sex marriage ruling.

Thomas was among four dissenting justices in 2015. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito are the other dissenters who are on the court today. Roberts has been silent on the subject since he wrote a dissenting opinion in the case. Alito has continued to criticize the decision, but he said recently he was not advocating that it be overturned.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was not on the court in 2015, has said that there are times when the court should correct mistakes and overturn decisions, as it did in the 2022 case that ended a constitutional right to abortion. But Barrett has suggested recently that same-sex marriage might be in a different category than abortion because people have relied on the decision when they married and had children.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage-50eb4ad421911696e742d8c4fb4962fd



REFERENCES

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143384965
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143484295
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143501822
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143510861
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143560573
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143561208

Article updated.

Original article -

Updated 9:33 AM EST, November 10, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a call to overturn its landmark decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

The justices turned away an appeal from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the high court's 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Davis had been trying to get the court to overturn a lower-court order for her to pay $360,000 in damages and attorney's fees to a couple denied a marriage license. Her lawyers repeatedly invoked the words of Justice Clarence Thomas, who alone among the nine justices has called for erasing the same-sex marriage ruling.

Thomas was among four dissenting justices in 2015. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito are the other dissenters who are on the court today. Roberts has been silent on the subject since he wrote a dissenting opinion in the case. Alito has continued to criticize the decision, but he said recently he was not advocating that it be overturned.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I guess the religious fundamentalists will just have to not go to gay weddings. Jacson6 Nov 10 #1
Good. More cake for me. Seinan Sensei Nov 10 #10
Finally some GREAT news. lostnfound Nov 10 #2
Good news on this one important front Easterncedar Nov 10 #3
Good news. milestogo Nov 10 #4
Great news...Finally! sheshe2 Nov 10 #5
SCOTUS actually making good decision? question everything Nov 10 #6
More like deciding not to make a decision DFW Nov 10 #21
I was so afraid. LittleGirl Nov 10 #7
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court denies review of Kim Davis' petition that sought to overturn Obergefell LetMyPeopleVote Nov 10 #8
She has loved the attention she got over this Bayard Nov 10 #11
Sad that this good news is so surprising. (nt) Paladin Nov 10 #9
Good, now Davis can go back to Kentucky and find a few more cousins to marry FoxNewsSucks Nov 10 #12
Ha ha! wolfie001 Nov 10 #20
Good news today, but cannot be complacent IzzaNuDay Nov 10 #13
Kim Davis will be back again. Repubs can't take no for an answer. ificandream Nov 10 #16
Barrett is so fucking infuriating Stargleamer Nov 10 #14
Glad to see Kim Davis get slapped in the face again. ificandream Nov 10 #15
Good news! AZ-Elisabeth Nov 10 #17
Anyone like kim davis should never have had the right to refuse marriage certificates to others, considering how many SWBTATTReg Nov 10 #18
Ask Donny if he'll pay the fine Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 10 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rejects cal...