Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Haggard Celine

(17,604 posts)

3. I don't know the figures,

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Nov 25, 2025, 06:52 PM

Tuesday

but we must be spending an ungodly amount on security. From judges and politicians to school board members, people are being threatened and they are continually adding to their security. I guess if we're going to allow people to carry guns around everywhere, we're going to have to keep hiring more security and police. It seems unsustainable to me.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rhiannon12866

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

As judges face more threats, only the Supreme Court gets new security funds [View all] BumRushDaShow Tuesday OP

Only judges appointed by Dem presidents need to worry about their security Bayard Tuesday #1

disgusting. Have supremes ever had "special" security as this bill would provide? Seems unprecedented but I dunno. Evolve Dammit Tuesday #2

I don't know the figures, Haggard Celine Tuesday #3