Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

no_hypocrisy

(53,920 posts)
3. It's disheartening as an attorney.
Fri Nov 28, 2025, 10:24 AM
Friday

You get a client. The facts and the law are in the favor of your client.

You go to trial. You win. Your adversary appeals.

Appellate Court: You win. Your adversary appeals.

State Supreme Court: You win. Your adversary appeals to the USSC. (Same thing with Federal Appellate Court)

Your client is running out of money.

You go before the USSC. All six of the majority and their law clerks know you're right. Even on Originalist Doctrine.

And SCOTUS rules against you. You should have won. Your client lost the bet and all the money. You feel as though you let your client down. But you relied on precedent and stare decisis.

And think if you're a law professor. How do you teach law that isn't recognized by SCOTUS?

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Retired judges warn that ...»Reply #3