Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(45,903 posts)
12. At its core this case is an indirect attack on the Sony decision
Mon Dec 1, 2025, 01:01 PM
19 hrs ago

The heart of the copyright owner’s argument is that an entity that provides a product or service with knowledge that it can and will be used by some purchasers to engage in infringement, even where the product or service has substantial non-infringing uses, should be subject that entity to massive financial liability as a “contributory” infringer.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»$1 billion Supreme Court ...»Reply #12