Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
29. But what you "know" is wrong and directly contradicted by the just-released document.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:37 AM
Sep 2013

You have a false sense of safety based on what you "know", because what you "know" is wrong.

The just-released document directly contradicts what you "know", and some of it is still censored:

<snip>

Not six. The bomb had four, one of which is not effective in the air.

<snip>

One "set off" by the fall. Two rendered ineffective by aircraft breakup.

That's right - ONE!

DELETED

Yeah. It would have been bad news - in spades.

<snip>

The Mk 39 Mod 2 bomb did not possess adequate safety for the airborne alert role in the B-52**. Alt 197 was performed on these bombs to provide additional safety, but it only interrupted (additionally) the lines between the bisch generator and the low voltage thermal battery. When the B-52 disintegrates in the air, it is likely to release the bombs in a near normal fashion***. The unalterable conclusion is that the only effective safing device during airborne alert was the ready-safe switch, be it the MC772 (Goldsboro) or the MC1288 (Alt 197).

If a short to an "arm" line occurred in a mid-air breakup, a postulate that seems credible, the Mk 39 Hod 2 bomb could have given a nuclear burst.

[hr]

*SC-DR-81-61, Analysis of the Safety Aspects of the Mk 39 Mod 2 Bombs Involved in B-52G Crash Near Greensboro (sic), North Carolina.

**The same conclusion should be drawn about present day SAC bombs, i.e. the B28FI, the B53, and the B41.

***This characteristic was graphically demonstrated at Palomares, as well.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Atom bomb nearly exploded over North Carolina in 1961: UK paper bananas Sep 2013 #1
Goldsboro revisited: account of hydrogen bomb near-disaster over North Carolina – declassified docum bananas Sep 2013 #2
Seymour Johnson AFB supernova Sep 2013 #3
See more Johnson? jberryhill Sep 2013 #4
I wish I had more Johnson to see. olddad56 Sep 2013 #16
May have been part of the U.S. "Operation Northwoods" to drum up support for a War against Cuba: blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #5
Well, better luck next time jberryhill Sep 2013 #6
Secret - my ass. That incident is well known. GreenStormCloud Sep 2013 #7
Thank you, GSC sarge43 Sep 2013 #11
I first heard of this in the early 70's postatomic Sep 2013 #14
I think I've even seen a docu-drama on History channel obxhead Sep 2013 #18
Train as you fight. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #21
But what you "know" is wrong and directly contradicted by the just-released document. bananas Sep 2013 #29
Considering that I was working from years old memory, I think I did pretty well. N/T GreenStormCloud Sep 2013 #40
I actually know someone who would have been privy to the information about the safeties davidpdx Sep 2013 #43
Almost a friendly fire on steroids incident? indepat Sep 2013 #8
Ancient news here - Maybe the folks in England didn't know...? bluemarkers Sep 2013 #9
Hell, it's on wikipedia benh57 Sep 2013 #27
Funny what We the People don't know about when it comes to nuclear weapons. Octafish Sep 2013 #10
Denial - it's not just a river in Egypt. bananas Sep 2013 #30
And it was all Obama's fault. whistler162 Sep 2013 #12
+ googol BootinUp Sep 2013 #19
thread win treestar Sep 2013 #35
Yup. Can't resist. Sorry if it's old to you. Not as old as recycled anxiety: freshwest Sep 2013 #44
Hilarious! treestar Sep 2013 #47
While adding more safeties is a good thing, ManiacJoe Sep 2013 #13
If this sort of "revelation" bothers you...DO NOT see this film: FailureToCommunicate Sep 2013 #15
That was the first thing that came to mind. I belive they cover the NC story in thge docu? No? Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2013 #22
Yes. That one and SO many other 'close calls' FailureToCommunicate Sep 2013 #34
It is only a matter of time before we suffer some sort of nuke disaster. olddad56 Sep 2013 #17
Well known icarusxat Sep 2013 #20
Music video for that quote, which is engraved on Max Weber's grave in Heidelberg: freshwest Sep 2013 #45
Old story, but I worry about command and control for 3rd world nukes ThoughtCriminal Sep 2013 #23
I've been to Goldsboro jmowreader Sep 2013 #24
Three fail safes failed but the fourth and last one worked, preventing the catastrophe. Kablooie Sep 2013 #25
Recommended: "JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters," by James Douglass. Peace Patriot Sep 2013 #26
Keystone Cops...... ReRe Sep 2013 #28
Not only is this NOT news...... DeSwiss Sep 2013 #31
Although I am always open to information, not sure I needed truedelphi Sep 2013 #32
Nightmares of potential nuclear oblivion..... DeSwiss Sep 2013 #38
And notice the number of incidents has fallen Kelvin Mace Sep 2013 #37
Or fewer nukes. Lots of our nukes have been dismantled. N/T GreenStormCloud Sep 2013 #41
May not necessarily be new news but the question remains dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #33
I was born about two weeks after that incident Kelvin Mace Sep 2013 #36
That would have been three days after, ... CRH Sep 2013 #39
Why put down those who think it's a new revelation? bobGandolf Sep 2013 #42
Not puting the OPer down, but am putting down the media. GreenStormCloud Sep 2013 #46
Okay, misunderstood n/t bobGandolf Sep 2013 #48
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US nearly detonated atomi...»Reply #29