Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tadpole Raisin

(1,889 posts)
2. They'll mention one prior ruling that supports their position in a most arcane and implausible way
Sat Jun 28, 2025, 03:01 PM
Jun 28

while ignoring prior rulings that are so pertinent you’d have to be corrupt not to see it.

Did I say corrupt?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The Corporate Court: How ...»Reply #2