Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

stopdiggin

(14,042 posts)

1. Hmmm. I guess you can stand behind 'no apologies' - but does that make

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sun Jul 6, 2025, 02:19 PM

Jul 6

the forecasting involved in this weather event any more (or less) faulty - or ultimately to blame? Reports I've read haven't really supported ...

The cuts to NWS are of course absolutely a bad idea ... But you still need to show where they contributed in this instance ...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ron Filipkowski - We Make NO APOLOGIES For Being 1st to Connect NWS Cuts & Texas Tragedy [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 6 OP

Hmmm. I guess you can stand behind 'no apologies' - but does that make stopdiggin Jul 6 #1

The San Antonio office was missing a senior hydrologist, staff forecaster, and meteorologist in charge. Lonestarblue Jul 6 #2

so you are asserting that essential calls were not made? stopdiggin Jul 6 #8

Here you go . . . hatrack Jul 6 #3

NYT this morning... hlthe2b Jul 6 #6

does not really matter Skittles Jul 6 #7

NYT-As Floods Hit, Key Roles Were Vacant at Weather Service Offices in Texas (gift links) LetMyPeopleVote Jul 6 #4

A true American hero -- Gen Honore -- disagrees. Silent Type Jul 6 #5