Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(36,989 posts)
1. Sure, greed.
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 03:37 PM
Jul 11

Everybody wants to maintain their income and reduce losses to income while increasing income.

I do. They do. You're likely to. Non-profits even want to increase revenue above inflation for the most part--pay workers more, increase influence and expand their mission, hire more workers.

But in this case the APA that we so love when it hamstringed Trump 1.0 and still will come for Trump 2.0 is an equal opportunity ham-stringer. Except that often enforcement is done through court cases brought by those with standing. In this case, enforcing the law is done by companies that don't like the effect of the regulation. In other cases, it's brought by NGOs or state governments opposed to Trump, often because it's, um, going to affect their bottom line.

One law for them all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Anti-Bureaucracy Measure ...»Reply #1