Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,085 posts)
7. Yup. 9/17 it was 4.3%.
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 03:30 PM
Saturday

Of course, it was 4.5% in 11/21, but it wasn't 4.3!

It's the old semantics example, "Do you have $10 I could borrow for lunch?" Response: "If I had $10, you could certainly borrow it. But, no, I don't have $10." Later the respondent is taking $90 out of her wallet. "You asked if I had $10. I didn't. I had $110." The over-literal versus what's going to be interpreted based on assumed intended meaning. It's considered an act of ill-will, linguistically speaking, a kind of social hostility.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Billionaires Feast While ...»Reply #7