How the Elite Behave When No One Is Watching: Inside the Epstein Emails [View all]

Photo illustration by Celina Pereira; Photographs by Getty Images
(snip)
At the dark heart of this story is a sex criminal and his victims and his enmeshment with President Trump. But it is also a tale about a powerful social network in which some, depending on what they knew, were perhaps able to look away because they had learned to look away from so much other abuse and suffering: the financial meltdowns some in the network helped trigger, the misbegotten wars some in the network pushed, the overdose crisis some of them enabled, the monopolies they defended, the inequality they turbocharged, the housing crisis they milked, the technologies they failed to protect people against.
(snip)
Their loyalty, it appears, is less downward to people and communities than horizontal to fellow members of their borderless network. Back in 2016, Theresa May, then the prime minister of Britain, seemed to capture their essence: If you believe you are a citizen of the world, you are a citizen of nowhere. Epsteins correspondents come alive far from home, freed from obligations, in the air, ready to connect.
(snip)
For this modern elite, seeming smart is what inheriting land used to be: a guarantor of opened doors. A shared hyperlink cant stand alone; your unique spin must be applied. Mr. Krauss sends his New Yorker article on militant atheism; Mr. Chomsky sends a multiparagraph reply; Mr. Epstein dashes off: I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry. This somehow leads to a suggestion that Mr. Krauss bring the actor Johnny Depp to Mr. Epsteins private island.
Again and again, scholarly types lower themselves to offer previews of their research or inquiries into Mr. Epsteins ideas. Maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation, muses Joscha Bach, a German cognitive scientist.
(snip)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/23/opinion/meaning-epstein-emails.html