Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

MichMan

(16,404 posts)

5. Rep. Ro Khanna in July demanded a full unredacted release of all documents

Reply to Uncle Joe (Reply #4)

Thu Nov 27, 2025, 03:07 PM

Thursday

Representative Ro Khanna (D‑CA) has announced plans to force a vote in the House of Representatives demanding the full, unredacted release of all documents related to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143495421

https://www.newsweek.com/democrat-ro-khanna-demands-vote-release-full-jeffrey-epstein-files-2098309

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Law firm representing alleged Epstein victims sends scathing letter over DOJ document release [View all] Uncle Joe Thursday OP

Yet, I see a lot of posts here demanding files be released with no redactions MichMan Thursday #1

I think they simply forgot to indicate "no redactions--except for victim's info). I can't imagine anyone aware would hlthe2b Thursday #3

I haven't seen anyone calling for release with no redactions of the victims names, many of whom were minors. Uncle Joe Thursday #4

Rep. Ro Khanna in July demanded a full unredacted release of all documents MichMan Thursday #5

The *rump administration had entirely closed the case in July, nothing to see here, and Khanna was speaking Uncle Joe Thursday #6

He must have changed his mind as he was calling for it at one time MichMan Thursday #7

Khanna has always been for protection of the victims Uncle Joe Thursday #9

Anyone want to bet the vengeful TSF ordered them included/non-redacted? hlthe2b Thursday #2

In civil law, there's a tort called public disclosure of private facts, which is a type of invasion of privacy. no_hypocrisy Thursday #8