Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Uncle Joe

(63,803 posts)

6. The *rump administration had entirely closed the case in July, nothing to see here, and Khanna was speaking

Reply to MichMan (Reply #5)

Thu Nov 27, 2025, 03:24 PM

14 hrs ago

of all the elites that *rump was protecting along with himself.

The Khanna/Massie bill, unanimously approved by the Senate and signed by the President within the past week or so specifically includes provisions to protect the victims identities.

The last paragraph of the OP lays out clearly who the victims blame for this along with the non-responsiveness of the DOJ, but you would rather blame a Democrat than *rump's DOJ which has been stonewalling this issue since May?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Law firm representing alleged Epstein victims sends scathing letter over DOJ document release [View all] Uncle Joe 14 hrs ago OP

Yet, I see a lot of posts here demanding files be released with no redactions MichMan 14 hrs ago #1

I think they simply forgot to indicate "no redactions--except for victim's info). I can't imagine anyone aware would hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #3

I haven't seen anyone calling for release with no redactions of the victims names, many of whom were minors. Uncle Joe 14 hrs ago #4

Rep. Ro Khanna in July demanded a full unredacted release of all documents MichMan 14 hrs ago #5

The *rump administration had entirely closed the case in July, nothing to see here, and Khanna was speaking Uncle Joe 14 hrs ago #6

He must have changed his mind as he was calling for it at one time MichMan 13 hrs ago #7

Khanna has always been for protection of the victims Uncle Joe 13 hrs ago #9

Anyone want to bet the vengeful TSF ordered them included/non-redacted? hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #2

In civil law, there's a tort called public disclosure of private facts, which is a type of invasion of privacy. no_hypocrisy 13 hrs ago #8