Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

MichMan

(16,393 posts)

7. He must have changed his mind as he was calling for it at one time

Reply to Uncle Joe (Reply #6)

Thu Nov 27, 2025, 03:47 PM

13 hrs ago

Good for him. Not blaming anyone other than those demanding full release with no redactions. I have seen other posts calling for no redactions, but since I can't find them now, I guess I was just making it up.

I thought it was the House Oversight Committee that released the Epstein estate emails anyway

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Law firm representing alleged Epstein victims sends scathing letter over DOJ document release [View all] Uncle Joe 14 hrs ago OP

Yet, I see a lot of posts here demanding files be released with no redactions MichMan 14 hrs ago #1

I think they simply forgot to indicate "no redactions--except for victim's info). I can't imagine anyone aware would hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #3

I haven't seen anyone calling for release with no redactions of the victims names, many of whom were minors. Uncle Joe 14 hrs ago #4

Rep. Ro Khanna in July demanded a full unredacted release of all documents MichMan 14 hrs ago #5

The *rump administration had entirely closed the case in July, nothing to see here, and Khanna was speaking Uncle Joe 14 hrs ago #6

He must have changed his mind as he was calling for it at one time MichMan 13 hrs ago #7

Khanna has always been for protection of the victims Uncle Joe 13 hrs ago #9

Anyone want to bet the vengeful TSF ordered them included/non-redacted? hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #2

In civil law, there's a tort called public disclosure of private facts, which is a type of invasion of privacy. no_hypocrisy 13 hrs ago #8