Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(57,866 posts)
9. The Beatles were/are very talented. Much of what they accomplished in the studio, though, was due to
Fri Aug 15, 2025, 10:59 AM
Aug 15

George Martin. And the initial success and later clout in the music industry were due to both Brian Epstein and Martin.

I did some googling yesterday, and it's common to see the Beatles, Led Zeppelin, the Rolling Stones and Pink Floyd listed as the four greatest rock bands (and sometimes with Led Zeppelin at the top; it's much rarer to see the Stones or Pink Floyd ahead of the Beatles and Zeppelin).

Of those four, the Beatles' appearance, industry clout and sound were shaped much, much more by their manager and producer than was true of the other three bands. I believe you could change managers and producers for the other three without changing their classic sound and the likely impact of their music. I'm not at all sure the same is true of the Beatles.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Music Appreciation»Oasis fans apparently hav...»Reply #9