Kentucky Investment in Blackstone Fund Shows Desperation/Cluelessness of Some Public Pension Funds [View all]
One of the easiest types of investors for Wall Street sharpies to fleece are public pension funds that have a large shortfall they are desperate to make up. Even seasoned traders can all too easily start putting on desperate wagers to try to earn their way out of a hole, or worse, cook the books and try to make the trading profits later. Public pension funds as a groups arent terribly savvy; even though the California giant CalPERS has been stonewalling us on disclosure, its generally seen as competent, which puts it way ahead of most of its peers.
As a new article by David Sirota in Pando Daily shows, by contrast, the Kentucky Retirement System, which manages $14.5 billion, is an obvious lamb led to slaughter. Sirotas source is Chris Tobe, an SEC whistleblower, former trustee of KRS, and author of Kentucky Fried Pensions, a book about the sorry condition of the Kentucky pension system.
KRS is one of the most severely underfunded retirement systems in the United States, with only 23% of its liabilities funded. As a result, the pension fund is up to its eyeballs in a reaching for return investment strategy, which means it has gone full bore into alternative investments, a fancy name for high risk, high return, and somewhat to very illiquid strategies like hedge funds, private equity funds, and real estate funds. Kentucky has a whopping 34% of its total funds invested in alternative investments versus the average across the pension fund industry of 22%. That allocation has increased from a mere 7% 12 years ago. More and more experts are starting to question this enthusiasm. As Sirota writes:
For instance, citing data from Wilshire Consulting, conservative conservative American Enterprise Institute scholar Andrew Biggs says these kinds of dangers make alternatives 60% riskier than U.S. stocks and more than five times riskier than bonds. Time Magazines Rana Foroohar reports that a recent conference of liberal scholars said the possibility of catastrophic losses mean pension funds shouldnt be in high-risk assets and should be mainly invested only in no or low fee index funds. And both the Government Accountability Office and Siedle have raised questions about the risks inherent in private equitys opacity and illiquidity.
Alternative investments carry much higher fees than buying stocks and bonds. Private equity and hedge funds are famed for their commonly touted 2% annual management fee and 20% upside fee, although there is a good deal of variability around these norms. For instance, very large private equity funds sport lower management fees; some hedge and private equity funds, like Bain, demand and get eyepopping 30% upside fees.
More at
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2014/05/kentucky-investment-blackstone-fund-funds-shows-desperation-cluelessness-public-pension-funds.html .