Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

A Little Weird

(1,754 posts)
2. Thanks for the response
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 07:40 PM
Mar 2013

I agree that local governments don't have the authority to thumb their nose at state law, but I don't believe that states have the right to thumb their nose at federal law either. That's why I think this is funny - both actions are equally absurd.

I don't believe the states exist above national government. Collectively, the states should have the power to change the federal government (I was under the impression that this was the ultimate goal of the MJ laws) but states shouldn't be able to go against a federal law on a whim. The state MJ laws that I have heard about came about because of ballot initiatives rather than from one dumbass using the state legislative body for his own personal agenda (as seems to be the case in KY).

Government at any level should reflect the will of the people. A national referendum law where initiatives like this could be directly decided by voters would be nice, IMO.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Cute but they lack legal underpinnings ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #1
Thanks for the response A Little Weird Mar 2013 #2
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Kentucky»LaRue fiscal court looks ...»Reply #2