Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SARose

(1,398 posts)
35. McDade Phela? Never heard of him
Wed Apr 30, 2025, 02:08 PM
Wednesday

The former Speaker of the House’s name is Dade Phelan. He is from a prominent Beaumont family.

(b) A person may not, with the intent to influence an
election, knowingly cause to be published, distributed, or
broadcast political advertising that includes an image, audio
recording, or video recording of an officeholder's or candidate's
appearance, speech, or conduct that did not occur in reality,
including an image, audio recording, or video recording that has
been altered using generative artificial intelligence technology,
unless the political advertising includes a disclosure from the
person or another person on whose behalf the political advertising is published, distributed, or broadcast indicating that the image, audio recording, or video recording did not occur in reality., knowingly cause to be published, distributed, or broadcast political advertising that includes an image, audio
recording, or video recording of an officeholder's or candidate's
appearance, speech, or conduct that did not occur in reality,
including an image, audio recording, or video recording that has
been altered using generative artificial intelligence technology,
unless the political advertising includes a disclosure from the
person or another person on whose behalf the political advertising
is published, distributed, or broadcast indicating that the image,
audio recording, or video recording did not occur in reality.


Calm down with all the Texas hate, folks! This is a tempest in a teapot.

Bill Title: Relating to required disclosures on certain political advertising that contains altered media; creating a criminal offense.

Here

2025-04-30 - House - Amendment fails of adoption RV#981 (Y: 25 N: 112 NV: 2 Abs: 11) [FAIL]

It never made it out of the house. Relax!

See? All it took was less than a minute to google Texas HB 366.

Title needs to be changed on this.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Texas can kiss my ass. This is my meme I am publishing on social media. Irish_Dem Wednesday #1
How long will it take before they are jailing people for telling the truth? tetedur Wednesday #2
Next in line DENVERPOPS Wednesday #9
That line is moving quickly. SergeStorms Wednesday #19
Couldn't agree more SS DENVERPOPS Wednesday #34
The jails will be full of "good trouble" troublemakers. CrispyQ Wednesday #3
I read this very differently -- the legislation says that if an org publishes a meme that features LauraInLA Wednesday #4
That's how I read it too. Susan Calvin Wednesday #38
Little more to Bill. It penalizes CAMPAIGNS from posting memes as true against another candidate. In other words, Silent Type Wednesday #5
Supreme Court has already ruled it's legal to blatantly LIE in campaign ads. Grins Wednesday #11
All the more reason for legislation like this. I know it's suspect being from Texas. But sounds like good legislation. Silent Type Wednesday #15
Jail me: Dave Bowman Wednesday #6
I guess Trump will be first in line publishing fake pics of hand tattoos Pisces Wednesday #7
So if you live in another state and post and anti Texas meme then they can come and fine or arrest you! kimbutgar Wednesday #8
"Forget it, Jake. It's Texas." Grins Wednesday #10
Any minute now drmeow Wednesday #40
We'll see if this applies to Republican Trump supporters and the rest of the Cuckoo-net. hadEnuf Wednesday #12
Absurd. Patently unconstitutional. Martin68 Wednesday #13
Hope it withstands court review. Campaigns should not use altered memes against another candidate. Saw too Silent Type Wednesday #16
Looks like these officials Figarosmom Wednesday #14
Gen. Phil Sheridan said this about Texass: Sneederbunk Wednesday #17
Ha ha! wolfie001 Wednesday #23
Unless I'm missing something in the actual bill, Susan Calvin Wednesday #18
Everything's a bit ramped up right now wolfie001 Wednesday #24
Lying, exaggerating, becoming like trump, is not way to do it. We don't need lies to resist trump. But it appears Silent Type Wednesday #27
well, you do you wolfie001 Wednesday #29
I will. I'm not going to become a liar like GOPers to win an election. Too much of that chit right now, honestly. Silent Type Wednesday #31
Maybe a strongly written letter will make them act sanely wolfie001 Wednesday #33
FYI this is a bipartisan bill. This might be the only decent TX legislation I've seen in years. LauraInLA Wednesday #36
Nothing new CentralBlueTexan Wednesday #20
1st amendment lawsuit in 3...2...1... Layzeebeaver Wednesday #21
Don't need any text for this one wolfie001 Wednesday #22
Get ready Cherokee100 Wednesday #25
Law suit incoming! This won't stand PortTack Wednesday #26
Something to remember if you rely on Social Security money and protest. LiberalArkie Wednesday #28
Texas: Book Burners who can't read. Kid Berwyn Wednesday #30
"dailypost.ng" is hyperventilating. maxsolomon Wednesday #32
McDade Phela? Never heard of him SARose Wednesday #35
Given that Republicans drmeow Wednesday #41
This is not true - please remove SARose Wednesday #37
I agree. It only took a bit of looking to see the actual bill and that it failed. One has to question the quality... xocetaceans Wednesday #39
Phelan amended this bill and it passed SARose Thursday #42
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Anger as US state passes ...»Reply #35