Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(168,710 posts)
1. MaddowBlog-Court rejects Texas Republicans' law requiring Ten Commandments displays in schools
Wed Aug 20, 2025, 02:59 PM
Aug 20

The Supreme Court has already ruled against Ten Commandments in classrooms. Republicans in several states are approving new laws anyway.

The Supreme Court has already ruled against state-imposed Ten Commandments displays in classrooms. Republicans keep approving new state laws anyway.

So far this summer, laws in Louisiana, Arkansas, and as of today, Texas, have lost in court. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-08-20T18:28:49.780Z

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/court-rejects-texas-republicans-law-requiring-ten-commandments-display-rcna226116

Now, Texas has joined the club. The Associated Press reported:

Texas cannot require public schools to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom, a judge said Wednesday in a temporary ruling against the state’s new requirement, making it the third such state law to be blocked by a court. A group of Dallas-area families and faith leaders sought a preliminary injunction against the law, which goes into effect on Sept. 1.


The ruling was issued by U.S. District Court Judge Fred Biery, who wrote: “Even though the Ten Commandments would not be affirmatively taught, the captive audience of students likely would have questions, which teachers would feel compelled to answer. That is what they do.”

His 55-page ruling began with quoting the First Amendment and ended with “Amen.”....

The Decalogue, the justices ruled in Stone v. Graham, is “undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths” and displaying them “serves no ... educational function.”

So why would Republicans in several states take a step that the Supreme Court has already rejected? It’s probably because they’re confident that the newly politicized high court and its dominant far-right majority will simply overturn the Stone precedent, doing fresh harm to the wall that’s supposed to separate church and state in this country.

These GOP officials are almost certainly aware of the First Amendment, just as they’re almost certainly aware of the Supreme Court precedent that says they cannot legally do what they’re trying to do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Judge temporarily blocks ...»Reply #1