Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Texas

SSJVegeta

(1,495 posts)

4. I was gonna say Politico left that out from their article when i saw if

Reply to walkingman (Reply #3)

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:13 PM

Sep 9

But i re read it and I was just too lazy to see all of it. Its a decent explanation. I am concerned about using the excuse of not "unilaterally disarming" because Republicans do it, in order to take special interest cash.

I think he will maintain a healthy balance and not go all on with corporate PAC donations. And I hope I'm right. He will be far more successful without it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

walkingman

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In U.S. Senate bid, Rep. James Talarico promises to take on GOP billionaires and bridge political divides [View all] TexasTowelie Sep 9 OP

I hope he is successful, it would be a big uplift for Texas. walkingman Sep 9 #1

My only concern is that he did accept a fairly large donation for his state legislatire run from a prominant billionaire SSJVegeta Sep 9 #2

This is his explanation - I believe him. walkingman Sep 9 #3

I was gonna say Politico left that out from their article when i saw if SSJVegeta Sep 9 #4