Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Canada

safeinOhio

(35,987 posts)

2. Why we need to test 10% of

Reply to inanna (Original post)

Mon Apr 13, 2020, 10:21 AM

Apr 2020

the random population to find those that don't get symptoms or don't show any. Then we would have the data that could be used to save 100% of us.
Too expensive? I don't think so.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Coronavirus survivors may carry 'superhero' antibodies and hope they can help others [View all] inanna Apr 2020 OP

And there's another subset of CV survivors who are susceptible to catching the Virus again. no_hypocrisy Apr 2020 #1

Why we need to test 10% of safeinOhio Apr 2020 #2

Every state must increase testing instead saidsimplesimon Apr 2020 #3

Maybe... Or not... defacto7 Apr 2020 #4