Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Election Reform

(53,544 posts)

10. If there was only one position on the ballot it would take less time.

Tue May 21, 2024, 01:01 PM

May 2024

But when there could be ten or more on the ballot it becomes more time-consuming.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I suggest voting machines are suspect and there's a good argument for hand counting. [View all] scipan Mar 2024 OP

Call me paranoid scipan Mar 2024 #1

you can suggest anything you like stopdiggin Mar 2024 #3

K&R, Thank you for posting this.... Think. Again. Mar 2024 #4

Tabulators and paper are fine. Voltaire2 Mar 2024 #5

Been saying this for literally decades. Susan Calvin Mar 2024 #6

If there was only one position on the ballot it would take less time. LiberalFighter May 2024 #10