Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Election Reform

eridani

(51,907 posts)

5. More and more people in WA State are coming to realize that they can avoid these annoying calls--

Reply to KT2000 (Reply #3)

Wed Jan 30, 2013, 01:18 AM

Jan 2013

--by voting soon after they receive their ballots. OR has had all mail-in for much longer, so their voters are ahead of the curve on this. This knowledge is vastly more important than imposing a receipt deadline in getting more ballots returned. Still, signature validation is an inherently slow and expensive process, and will continue to be the rate-limiting step.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

My Testimony Against Washington State SB 5291 and SB 5317 [View all] eridani Jan 2013 OP

Honestly I Want Ballots Received By rsmith6621 Jan 2013 #1

IOW, you want to keep people from having their votes counted eridani Jan 2013 #2

Good testimony! KT2000 Jan 2013 #3

More and more people in WA State are coming to realize that they can avoid these annoying calls-- eridani Jan 2013 #5

An official USPS postmark is widely accepted for all kinds submissions, cheapdate Jan 2013 #4

One of my election integrity contacts just pointed out to me that I missed something in SB 5317 eridani Jan 2013 #6