Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OnTheOtherHand

(7,621 posts)
7. not so clear
Fri Dec 23, 2011, 08:54 PM
Dec 2011

Certainly, if someone knew in advance that they could alter the outcome of the 2000 election by stealing under 1000 votes in Florida, they might be better off taking their chances with that than stealing votes all over the country. But since one wouldn't know that in advance -- and one might not be well connected in whatever state(s) turn out to be crucial -- one might prefer to steal the votes wherever one can get them. That might tend to be in the highly partisan states rather than the battleground states. Or the opportunities for mayhem might have little to do with partisanship and a lot to do with the technology.

Georgia votes on paperless touchscreens. Lots of people will tell you they were hacked in 2002; I don't see much evidence of it. But, frankly, those systems don't produce much evidence of anything. Shouldn't we fix that -- among other things -- before we implement a national popular vote? Georgia alone has about 4 million voters. You may think it would be crazy hard to steal half a million votes or more nationwide, but how sure are you?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»serious question about po...»Reply #7