Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CloudWatcher

(2,105 posts)
8. Yeah ... no, I disagree
Sun Jan 2, 2022, 07:43 PM
Jan 2022

The focus of the article is that most web traffic now uses HTTPS and not HTTP. So the
content of that traffic is no longer subject to sniffing. That's true.

It does mention the other uses of VPN (location hiding, et al). And that those reasons persist.

It doesn't mention DNS lookups, but that's not uncommon in articles like this.

It also doesn't mention that HTTPS traffic hides the content but not the addresses of the
traffic. If it did that, then they'd also have to mention that more and more of the content
of the Internet is now hosted by CDNs (content delivery network), so even knowing the IP
address of who you're talking with is often not the same as knowing what "host" you are
talking with.

It also mentions that the ads for VPNs are garbage. That's absolutely true. It's astonishing
how much fear they try and instill and how inflated they say their value-added is.

Sadly I've rarely read a good review of the risks of using a VPN. You're putting a lot of
trust in that vendor.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Help & Search»Computer Help and Support»Here's why you probably d...»Reply #8