Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Weird News

rurallib

(63,956 posts)

4. One would think a company like P&G wouldn't try stupid tricks like this knowing

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Original post)

Fri Aug 24, 2018, 08:08 AM

Aug 2018

that it would open them to scorn and ridicule.
Guess they will learn.

I remember a few years ago when they tried to avoid a tax in Great Britain by arguing that Pringles was not food.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WTF? P&G Wants to Trademark L.O.L. [View all] muriel_volestrangler Aug 2018 OP

Lucifer Our Lord gets an LOL from me underpants Aug 2018 #1

I only had to look up one, FOMO. I have a Croney Aug 2018 #2

before the web, we used it in bridge discussion groups to refer to little old ladies unblock Aug 2018 #3

One would think a company like P&G wouldn't try stupid tricks like this knowing rurallib Aug 2018 #4

They might succeed in registering them for a particular class of goods... CaptainTruth Aug 2018 #5