Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Congress

(19,382 posts)

5. I could see both arguments on this

Wed Mar 9, 2022, 11:19 AM

Mar 2022

One difference to Supreme Court is they are only 9. If we allow senators at 100. House next at 325? It’s too much.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Attorney seeks to stop special election for Inhofe's seat [View all] Eugene Mar 2022 OP

It seems pretty clear cut. LuvLoogie Mar 2022 #1

I totally agree. Having elections, appointments etc jimfields33 Mar 2022 #2

I've heard the same argument regarding SC Justice Breyer MichMan Mar 2022 #4

I could see both arguments on this jimfields33 Mar 2022 #5

Yeah, no. Kingofalldems Mar 2022 #8

SCOTUS judges are appointed for a life term, not temporary. LuvLoogie Mar 2022 #6

+1 Sneederbunk Mar 2022 #7

Same reasoning; what if Breyer changes his mind ? MichMan Mar 2022 #9

Enid attorney Stephen Jones mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2022 #3