Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Congress

LuvLoogie

(7,421 posts)

10. It's a hearing for an appointment. The relevant election has already occurred.

Reply to MichMan (Reply #9)

Wed Mar 9, 2022, 11:46 PM

Mar 2022

The relevant election is the previous presidential election and elected and sitting senators. A temporary filling of a vacant congressional seat can be appointed immediately. A governor can have someone lined up without holding an election. But an election has to occur.

Your argument supports McConnell's specious tactics.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Attorney seeks to stop special election for Inhofe's seat [View all] Eugene Mar 2022 OP

It seems pretty clear cut. LuvLoogie Mar 2022 #1

I totally agree. Having elections, appointments etc jimfields33 Mar 2022 #2

I've heard the same argument regarding SC Justice Breyer MichMan Mar 2022 #4

I could see both arguments on this jimfields33 Mar 2022 #5

Yeah, no. Kingofalldems Mar 2022 #8

SCOTUS judges are appointed for a life term, not temporary. LuvLoogie Mar 2022 #6

+1 Sneederbunk Mar 2022 #7

Same reasoning; what if Breyer changes his mind ? MichMan Mar 2022 #9

It's a hearing for an appointment. The relevant election has already occurred. LuvLoogie Mar 2022 #10

Enid attorney Stephen Jones mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2022 #3