Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

Major Nikon

(36,922 posts)

3. The best part was the replies to the debunking

Reply to lumberjack_jeff (Reply #2)

Sat May 17, 2014, 12:07 AM

May 2014

Q. What is your response to the biological evidence of gender preference in babies?

No, the evidence that debunked our "hypothesis" doesn't change anything.
"I have what you would call a theoretical basis. There is no room for biology in there for me."

Both questioned the researchers motives for debunking them.

Claimed science can't prove them wrong, yet had no basis in science for their "hypothesis".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Reposted for discussion here [View all] Major Nikon May 2014 OP

Nobody does anything for just one reason. Ever. nt rrneck May 2014 #1

Excellent. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2014 #2

The best part was the replies to the debunking Major Nikon May 2014 #3

And they call themselves academics. lumberjack_jeff May 2014 #4