Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thesquanderer

(12,686 posts)
11. Thanks, and it was a good attempt, but it still doesn't make sense to me.
Wed Jun 11, 2025, 12:35 PM
Jun 11

Salaries (which generate W2s) and contractors (which generate 1099s) are all normally fully deductible in the year they happen, not amortized over the following 10-15 years as the article alludes to. Things like the building and development of facilities, equipment purchases etc., yes, those are kinds of things that are typically amortized over years and not normally immediately fully deductible, so then the relevance of such a change is clear. But the articles discuss personnel/salaries, where I don't see that relevance.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»There's a Fascinating Hid...»Reply #11