Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Education

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)

3. Sorry I disagree.

Reply to MichiganVote (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 17, 2012, 10:10 PM

Oct 2012

1. ESY is an IEP team decision.

2. All districts must have ESY programs available for kids who qualify.

Now, you and I both know that yes, it's expensive and yes, admins review every program we offer our sped kids. But technically, the law says it's a team decision. Cost can't be a factor. If this ends up in court, the district will lose.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SF Special ed teachers say administrator's e-mail broke law [View all] RandySF Oct 2012 OP

Not quite. MichiganVote Oct 2012 #1

Sorry I disagree. proud2BlibKansan Oct 2012 #3

The fact that the woman included her cost concerns in an email does not support MichiganVote Oct 2012 #5

The district is represented sulphurdunn Oct 2012 #7

A district can be represented by any administrator they so choose. And... MichiganVote Oct 2012 #8

1. True sulphurdunn Oct 2012 #9

Thanks for the discussion. But, despite what most people think MichiganVote Oct 2012 #10

In my school district... Stargazer09 Oct 2012 #2

More than a decade ago, LWolf Oct 2012 #4

Yup. Same stupidity. MichiganVote Oct 2012 #6