Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
9. 1. True
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 08:45 PM
Oct 2012

2. True, but in most states parental consent in writing is required before the annual IEP can be implemented, in which case the old IEP becomes the fallback position, which creates no end of new difficulties.

3. True

4. Most LEAs use addenda for changes to the annual IEP unless a student transfers from a different state, in which case a new IEP needs to be written.

5. It has been my experience that ESYs do not remediate the academic problems you describe for most students unless due primarily to attendance, which is problematic when considering ESY for such students.

6. Yea, that sure was dumb.

7. This has been an interesting discussion. Thanks.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not quite. MichiganVote Oct 2012 #1
Sorry I disagree. proud2BlibKansan Oct 2012 #3
The fact that the woman included her cost concerns in an email does not support MichiganVote Oct 2012 #5
The district is represented sulphurdunn Oct 2012 #7
A district can be represented by any administrator they so choose. And... MichiganVote Oct 2012 #8
1. True sulphurdunn Oct 2012 #9
Thanks for the discussion. But, despite what most people think MichiganVote Oct 2012 #10
In my school district... Stargazer09 Oct 2012 #2
More than a decade ago, LWolf Oct 2012 #4
Yup. Same stupidity. MichiganVote Oct 2012 #6
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»SF Special ed teachers sa...»Reply #9