Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
7. i agree with you on the 'faceless' thing, & it kind of ties into what i meant by "where is this?"
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 05:52 AM
Nov 2012

the hero's 'faceless' apartment (bare white, little furniture -- maybe large for nyc, but still a studio -- is this really supposed to be nyc? it's not so clear) -- the 'faceless' unidentifiable streets around the school and the incongruous juxtaposition of the lighting store & the child hooker), the white halls with the stereotypical black ghetto type parachuted into the nearly all-white school -- i think the school is nowhere & everywhere, it's faceless/mix of suburbia/ghetto on purpose, because the story isn't particularly about 'the ghetto' or inner-city schools or material poverty, it's about society in general.

maybe the child is always dressed scantily, that uncertainy in viewing her as child/sexualized because that's the same tension that exists in society, where we talk a good game about sexualizing kids and all are a-twitter about pedophiles -- but the culture at large in fact encourages sexualization of children through various means.

just my opinion. lots of food for thought but i felt some overkill at certain points and some conflict in the subtext.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Watched Detachment on Net...»Reply #7