Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

NNadir

(36,193 posts)

4. It's a shame that the children blinded by a lack of access to golden rice...

Reply to hatrack (Original post)

Fri Feb 28, 2025, 10:54 AM

Feb 2025

...didn't have access to legal powers to sue Greenpeace and that the large team of Nobel Laureate who called them out for that lack of access didn't fund one.

If you ask me, and maybe no one will, Greenpeace has played a huge role in keeping the fossil fuel industry viable. There attitudes have been great, for instance, for the German coal industry.

I oppose fossil fuels but I don't give a flying fuck about Greenpeace, kangaroo court or not.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Imagine That! More Than Half The Jury In ND Greenpeace Pipeline Trial Have Direct Ties To Oil & Gas Industry [View all] hatrack Feb 2025 OP

Assuming they are convicted, who decides the amount of damages? biophile Feb 2025 #1

If they're found liable, I'm assuming it's up to the jury, but not certain. hatrack Feb 2025 #2

You are correct in that! The example is the plan biophile Feb 2025 #5

It's ND fer Pete's sakes. It's either wheat or oil. Or Dairy Queen. marble falls Feb 2025 #3

It's a shame that the children blinded by a lack of access to golden rice... NNadir Feb 2025 #4

If Greenpeace was an idea instead of an autocratic fundraising organization structured as a corporation... hunter Feb 2025 #6