Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,295 posts)
6. Lost in this discussion is Carbon Dioxide
Sat Jun 14, 2025, 03:23 PM
Saturday

The tests measured NMHC, NOx & CO, leading to this startling comparison:

Let's put that in perspective. To equal the hydrocarbon emissions of about a half-hour of yard work with this two-stroke leaf blower, you'd have to drive a Raptor for 3,887 miles, or the distance from Northern Texas to Anchorage, Alaska.


A quick bit of common sense: What are the capacities of the fuel tanks on these vehicles and leaf blowers? How many times will that “Raptor” tank be filled on that drive? How much fuel will be burned? How much CO₂ will be created? How much fuel will be burned during that "half-hour of hard work?”

Don’t get me wrong. First off, I hate leaf blowers (of all kinds.) Secondly, if I used a leaf blower (I don’t) it would be electric.

https://egopowerplus.com/power-blowers/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Emissions Test: Car vs. T...»Reply #6