Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,580 posts)
4. The damage is already done by the construction activity.
Fri Aug 29, 2025, 08:13 AM
Aug 29

I don't know that having cameras would help anything. There is no baseline although I would imagine one could declare some other region suitably far away a control region.

Operationally there is likely to be other damage of course, leaking lubricants, leachates. The biggest one to my mind is the shedding of blade coatings, a well known phenomenon that accounts for the performance degradation that wind turbines display over their lifetimes, which on average, if one followed the Danish master register of wind turbines, is
less than 20 years. The Danish Energy Agency no longer provides this register probably because it showed just how crappy the wind industry, a major Danish industry, is.

I'm generally opposed to putting every square meter of the planet's surface, including the sea surface - or the sea floor that advocates of so called "renewable energy" want to mine for minerals to support their junk - to some kind of economic use to make money for this person or that person in the 1%.. I feel similarly about aquaculture.

My private battle is a losing one however.

From my perspective history will not forgive us nor should it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Trump Halts Wind Farm Nea...»Reply #4