Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

John1956PA

(4,511 posts)
9. I think the historic names of the rivers are always honored.
Sat Oct 4, 2025, 02:04 PM
5 hrs ago

I think the "Mississippi River" was always regarded as the name of that particular waterway which runs from the northern tier of our country south to the gulf. Yes, based on volume of water at the points where the Missouri River and Ohio River meet the Mississippi River, the distinction between "mainline" and "tributary" is not clear in my mind. However, I will say this. I think I misused the word "confluence" in my previous post. There is a true confluence between the Allegheny River and the Monongahela River in Pittsburgh. One river comes from the north, and the other from the south. They form a point at which neither one looks to be feeding into the other. The two rivers just simply come together. On the other hand, the merging points of the Missouri/Mississippi Revers and the Ohio/Mississippi Rivers have a different cartological look than the confluence at Pittsburgh. Since the Mississippi River is the central receiver in the watershed which bears its name, I can see where it is considered the mainline, rather than a tributary to the Missouri River and the Ohio River.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why don't they just follow Trump's train of reasoning and nuke the lake? John1956PA 6 hrs ago #1
Or sweep the forest. 2naSalit 6 hrs ago #3
The not so funny thing is Mblaze 5 hrs ago #7
How does that huge river start here? viva la 6 hrs ago #2
Lake Superior's waters flow toward the Atlantic through the other Great Lakes and then the St. Lawrence River. Mister Ed 6 hrs ago #4
Yes, the tracing rivers upstream can be interesting. John1956PA 6 hrs ago #5
Ah! Then maybe it's just a more or less an arbitrary decision on the part of mapmakers. Mister Ed 6 hrs ago #6
I think the historic names of the rivers are always honored. John1956PA 5 hrs ago #9
But it all flows...... lastlib 4 hrs ago #15
Well SOME names aren't always honored by SOME people. Beartracks 4 hrs ago #17
The different criteria for measuring rivers gets things convoluted BaronChocula 5 hrs ago #10
In addition to some other good explanations, there is the matter of old names established before known characteristics. erronis 5 hrs ago #8
Just call them all America River or Trump river to get instant approval. GreenWave 5 hrs ago #11
It's a rite of passage for MN kids to walk across the headwaters NickB79 2 hrs ago #20
My heart hurts Lulu KC 4 hrs ago #12
One of the problems might be non native bivalves... shell fish such as mussels .. that causes phosphorus to Botany 4 hrs ago #13
Seems unlikely. Erie gets ocean going vessels from the Atlantic... Wounded Bear 4 hrs ago #16
All it takes is one boat that was in the Great Lakes and not cleaned off underneath and or a shore or Botany 3 hrs ago #18
Zebra mussels haven't been found in Itasca. Yet NickB79 2 hrs ago #19
I am a half of a bottle of wine into my evening but this is a different creature from zebra mussels. Botany 1 hr ago #21
I remember reading many years ago, that the creeks and streams of lower Ontario FakeNoose 4 hrs ago #14
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Something is wrong with L...»Reply #9