Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,654 posts)
4. Marcellus Shale Gas Potential Much Lower than Previously Thought
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 04:26 PM
Jan 2012
http://www.essentialpublicradio.org/story/2012-01-24/marcellus-shale-gas-potential-much-lower-previously-thought-9967
[font face=Times, Serif]January 24, 2012
[font size=5]Marcellus Shale Gas Potential Much Lower than Previously Thought[/font]

[font size=3]The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) latest report finds reserve estimates for the Marcellus Shale formation are dramatically lower than reported last year. The estimate in the Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (AEO2012) is 141 trillion cubic feet of gas, compared to 410 trillion in 2011.

Policy and Communications Director for the Marcellus Shale Coalition, Steve Forde, said that isn’t of much concern, and added that the estimate is simply a “snapshot in time.” He said the coalition will continue to look at longer-term trends.

“Particularly looking back to when we were asking serious questions about where we were going to get energy for future generations, and looking forward now and seeing that there has been an incredible amount of natural gas discovered in this country and is recoverable thanks to technological advances,” he said.

The EIA report states that natural gas production is expected to continue to increase over the coming years, and that by early in the next decade natural gas production in the country will outpace demand. Thanks to Marcellus Shale development, the Commonwealth is already at that point.

…[/font][/font]
(The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that is…)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Natural-Gas Futures Exten...»Reply #4