Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(20,114 posts)
3. You need to brush up on your basic chemistry
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 03:46 PM
Jun 2014
...The two chemical reactions – hydrogen to formic acid and back to hydrogen - are catalytic: the advantage is that nothing is lost in the transformation, and the process can thus be used in constructing sustainable devices...


Something is ALWAYS lost, that something being energy. You lose LESS energy using a catalyst than you would without it, but to claim absolutely nothing is lost in the transformation would essentially be creating a perpetual motion system.

http://www.4college.co.uk/as/atm/catalysts.php

That's not to say this isn't a VERY promising development. You just have to tie it into an energy source that's renewable (such as solar and wind), because you need an external energy supply to both crack water into hydrogen and push the reaction. The same goes for the idea of using CO2 as a fuel stock; you just need a way to extract and compress it to high enough concentrations.

It also has the benefit of being a way to store renewable energy without requiring massive battery banks or large hydro systems.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Swiss scientists achieve ...»Reply #3