Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

REP

(21,691 posts)
9. For immunity, if continued 3-6 months
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 11:28 PM
Mar 2012
The broad assertions of the benefits of breast-feeding were challenged in an article published in the Octo- ber 2007 issue of the British Medical Journal. In a study of 17,046 Belorus- sian infants carried out over six years, Michael Kramer of Canada’s McGill University concluded that breast-feeding did not in fact offer greater protection against asthma or allergies. A year earlier, British statis- tician Geoff Der had published a much-discussed study on the subject of cognitive development and breast- feeding. Analyzing the I.Q.’s of more than 5,000 children and their 3,000 mothers, he concluded there was ab- solutely no link between I.Q. and breast-feeding. By observing families in which one child had been breast- fed and the other not, he confirmed that the key factor contributing to the child’s I.Q. was the mother’s I.Q., and that breast-feeding had no influence. Yet these striking results have done nothing to stop breast-feeding activists from allowing us to believe the contrary.


As for your comments, I wonder why you are attacking me personally. I did not write this essay.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The evil breastfeeding conspiracy. Crunchy Frog Mar 2012 #1
Did you read the entire essay? REP Mar 2012 #2
It'd help if you didn't link to a site Confusious Mar 2012 #6
Oh, good grief Warpy Mar 2012 #3
The thing is the "extra benefits" are over hyped and women are guilted into it REP Mar 2012 #4
Since you didn't quote the whole thing and Harper's didn't make it available Warpy Mar 2012 #5
Ah crap. Wasn't aware it wasn't available. I'd copy the whole thing except for DU's copyright rules. REP Mar 2012 #7
Studies have said it's better Confusious Mar 2012 #8
For immunity, if continued 3-6 months REP Mar 2012 #9
I can probably find 10 studies that say they do have those benefits. Confusious Mar 2012 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Mar 2012 #19
It's a reference from the essay, quoted in my OP REP Mar 2012 #21
I wouldn't; sounds like potential copyright trouble. gkhouston Mar 2012 #22
Yeah, me too - guess I'm radical! REP Mar 2012 #23
Same here. Well said n/t Catherina Mar 2012 #24
Women are incredibly sad when they cannot breastfeed. Adriennecliona Mar 2012 #28
It's one of those questions that was scientifically settled before the backwards march started... saras Mar 2012 #10
Breast feeding was a good choice for my little boy and I Nikia Mar 2012 #11
The best thing about breastfeeding, for me, was my health improvement clyrc Mar 2012 #12
I think breastfeeding is great. Fight profit-making companies like Nestlé Catherina Mar 2012 #13
The great Nestle boycott Catherina Mar 2012 #14
Nestle boycott list Catherina Mar 2012 #15
For women without access to potable water, this has always made sense REP Mar 2012 #16
I understand better now Catherina Mar 2012 #18
One of the first things you learn as a parent is that no matter what choices you make gkhouston Mar 2012 #20
Haha. Really? Catherina Mar 2012 #25
Re-read the post: "I wonder what *would* have happened." gkhouston Mar 2012 #26
What about the babies Adriennecliona Mar 2012 #27
Hi, Neighbor! REP Mar 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»Harpers - The Tyranny of ...»Reply #9