Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7. It's not even about liability in some cases. It's just black-and-white thinking.
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 06:51 PM
Jul 2016

"It's against the law, therefore we must enforce the law" type mentality. No further thought process behind it.

Dish Network fired some guy for using medical marijuana in Colorado some number of years ago. The Colorado State Supreme court sided with Dish Network. I don't think it was a liability issue so much as a 'he tested positive and we have a hardline stance against drug users' issue. The person who tested positive was a quadriplegic so I don't believe they fired him in the interest of keeping others safe.

Link: http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/fixgov/posts/2015/06/18-coats-v-dish-network-right-on-colorado-marijuana-law-hudak

I really hate when corporations try to push their morality on their employees, or people who use their businesses. Heard awhile back that JP Morgan Chase decided to block pornography participants from using their services. Nothing illegal about that... Just straight up JP Morgan Chase limiting who can use their services based on what someone in the company deemed inappropriate. It's something that really pisses me off, to be honest.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Mental Health Support»Advice on job seeking, li...»Reply #7