Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
3. Frankly, they're correct about thinner walls and some component's ability to last.
Sat May 23, 2015, 03:59 PM
May 2015

If we're talking about tract home quality or average middle-low quality, they're sort of correct.

A 1920 home would have had significantly larger framing members. A two by four was actually two by four inches.

Subfloors were tongue and grove, one inch or better, then hardwood floor over that.

Ceramic tiles were laid in a thick bed of mortar, seriously thick and sturdy!

Tubs were cast iron, not fiberglass.

As engineers learned how to trim here and there, they did that and the utility of things didn't suffer that badly.

Today, the best built homes are using bigger framing members, 2 x 6's, and the tile is set in thick mortar, and they'll use 5/8 drywall.

Just like the old days!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»DIY & Home Improvement»question about residentia...»Reply #3